Gravimetric Analysis, Volumetric Analysis, Statistics and Ksp
Tuesday, October 1, 1996 Afternoon
100 points (exam sums to 100) Name _________________________________.
Directions: Answer all questions in the spaces provided. Solutions must show complete set-ups, including units, for credit to be given. Unsupported answers will be given zero credit. Points may be deducted when improper rounding causes significant numerical errors. All required values are given on the exam (plus some extra ones, so choose only what you need). Your calculator and one 3x5 inch card with anything you wish written on it may be brought to the exam. Additional notes or helps are prohibited.
1. (2 points) Give the molar concentrations for the following Reagent Grade chemicals as specified in the table given to you in lecture. Your number must be correct to at least two significant figures.
Sulfuric Acid
18.0 M
Ammonia (Ammonium Hydroxide) 14.5 M
2. (12 points) 500 mL of an approximately 0.03 M Nitric Acid wash solution is to be prepared using 6 M nitric acid prepared by diluting the 15 M acid found in the hood. How many milliliters of the 6 M nitric acid reagent should be added to the 500 mL of water?
Remember, start with the FINAL solution first. In this case the Final solution is 500 mL of 0.02 M HNO3. Calculate how many moles of HNO3 will be required, then calculate the mL of the SOURCE solution (6 M HNO3) to use. Don't be mislead by other reagents that may be mentioned in the problem.3. (12 points) You are given an unknown thought to contain 32% Fe. How many grams of this unknown should you weigh out to get 2.1 millimoles of Fe for a titration? [GFW of Fe is 55.847.]
0.500 L
0.03 mole HNO3 L 1000 ml L 6 mole HNO3 L = 2.5 mL of 6M HNO3 required.
Remember the trick of expressing "wierd" concentrations units in a way you can do proper dimensional analysis; e.g. ppm works better as mg/Liter, and 27% Fe works better as 0.27g Fe/g unk, and GFW of Fe is 55.847 g Fe/mole Fe. We also should be used to having amounts expressed in millimoles by now, then converting to grams if we actually have to go into the balance room and weigh this AMOUNT out. Starting with the millimoles, then4. (12 points) 0.3991 g of an unknown containing chloride is dissolved and precipitated with 43.89 mL of excess 0.1056 M AgNO3. A sintered glass crucible weighing 23.4101 g is used to filter out the resulting AgCl. The new weight of the dried crucible is 23.9622 g. Compute %Cl in the sample. [GFW's: AgNO3 is 169.837, NaCl is 58.442, AgCl is 143.321, Cl is 35.453.]
2.1 mmoles Fe
1 mole Fe 55.847 g Fe g unknown 1000 mmole Fe mole Fe 0.32 g Fe = 0.366 g of unknown sample.
A classic error made on problems like this is to somehow assume that "an unknown containing chloride" is somehow a pure substance that has a formula weight and everything. Only part of it is chloride. Look to what the problem is asking you to solve:5. (5 points) In order to save silver nitrate reagent a student decides to use only about 20 mL of reagent for each titration run in the Chem 105 Volumetric Analysis of Chloride. Also, since the student didn't see why drop splitting was necessary at the end point, the volumes added could not be controlled to better than the size of one drop, which is 0.05 mL. Compute the percent relative error for these titrations, then use this value to explain if the student is at risk of getting a bad grade. [You are expected to use the 0.2% allowed relative error for the Chloride analysis in your explanation.]
%Cl in the sample = (grams Cl/grams sample) x 100%
We HAVE grams of sample; that is 0.3991 grams. Calculating grams of Cl will take a little more work. The one pure substance we have isolated here is the AgCl, so we must convert this to the grams of Cl that were in the sample.
23.9622 g (SGC + AgCl) - 23.4101 g (SGC alone) = 0.5521 g AgCl recovered.
The Chemical Reaction is Ag+ + Cl- = AgCl (s).
0.5521 g AgCl
mole AgCl 1 mole Cl 35.453 g Cl 143.321 g AgCl 1 mole AgCl mole Cl = 0.13657 g Cl (Remember to use one additonal significant figure for follow-on calculations. I still see some students rounding to 1 or 2 sig figs in their calculations. Points are taken off for this, not because of being picky, but because the final answer will be WRONG.)
Then (0.13657 g Cl/0.3991 g sample) x 100% = 34.22 %Cl (now round to 4 sig figs).
Here it is -- the deadly Relative Error Problem. As explained in lecture on several occasions, Relative errors are simple errors expressed as a percentage of the value being measured. In this case we are trying to measure a volume of about 15 mL. But since our volume change (uncertainty) is a whole 0.05 mL drop, then6. Compute the statistics asked for below for the following series of titrations: 0.0987 M, 0.0973 M, 0.09881 M, 0.0979 M. [For 95% C.L.: t for 1 d.f.= 12.7, 2 d.f. = 4.303, 3 d.f. = 3.18, 4 d.f. = 2.78, 5 d.f. = 2.57 Use the statistical functions on your calculator. Do NOT take the time to add up sums of squares "by hand!"]
(0.05 mL/20 mL) x 100% = 0.25 % error. Since 0.25 % error is greater than the 0.2% error allowed for the experiment, this is a BAD THING.
The mistake I see consistently on problems of this type is slavish adherence to a formula that is probably in all of the quant books. It is not wrong, it just doesn't cover all the cases of relative error we have discussed. The formula is:
This is a fine equation, but it doesn't apply in this problem because we already KNOW the uncertainty in our measured value, i.e. 0.05 mL. So don't look around for true and experimental values here to plug into this equation, because there are none. (Well -- 20 mL would be the True Value in this case, but there is no "Experimental Value" as such unless you make one up -- 14.95 and 15.05 would be the extremes of expected experimental values.)
A. (5 points) Mean
(By calculator) 0.12048 M (An extra significan figure is kept for follow-on calculations.)B. (5 points) Standard Deviation
(By calculator) 0.0110 M (A few people still did this by hand. There is no time for that!)C. (10 points) 95% Confidence Limit. State the formula and specify all values used before solving.
7. 0.3456 g of almost insoluble Co(OH)2 is placed in a beaker with 100.0 mL of water. Ksp Co(OH)2 is 1.57x10-9.
A. (5 points) Write the balanced dissociation reaction of Co(OH)2 in water.
Co(OH)2 = Co2+ + 2 OH-B. (5 points) Write the Ksp expression for Co(OH)2.
Ksp = [Co2+][OH-]2C. (5 points) Is this a Common Ion, or Simple Solubility Problem?
This is a simple solubility problem. There are no outside sources of Co2+ or of OH-.D. (10 points) Compute the concentration of Co2+in the water after the solid cobalt hydroxide equilibrates with the water.
For every s moles of Co(OH)2 that dissolve, s moles of Co2+ and 2s moles of OH- appear in solution. There are no other sources of these ions. Plugging into the Ksp expression, we get8. (12 points) 0.1000 M AgNO3 is used to precipitate the chloride in a dissolved unknown. After the reaction, the total volume of the solution is 125 mL, and an excess of 0.245 millimoles of Ag+ were left over. Compute the molar concentration of Cl- in the solution. Ksp AgCl is 1.82x10-10.
Finally, [Co2+] = s = 6.9x10-6
This is a Common Ion problem, since 1.45 millimoles of Ag+ are left over from outside sources. Since you have already been given the final conditions here, you don't need to spend the time setting up a full Initial/Final spreadsheet.
CAg+ = [Ag+] (approximately) = 0.245 millimoles/125 mL = 0.00196 M
Then [Cl-] = Ksp/[Ag+] = 1.82x10-10/0.00196 = 9.29x10-8 M